Glossary entry (derived from question below)
German term or phrase:
Sprungklage
English translation:
leap-frog action
- The asker opted for community grading. The question was closed on 2012-12-21 20:54:07 based on peer agreement (or, if there were too few peer comments, asker preference.)
Dec 18, 2012 19:32
11 yrs ago
1 viewer *
German term
United States
Sprungklage
German to English
Law/Patents
Law (general)
Die Klaegering hat Sprungklage erhoben.
Proposed translations
(English)
| 4 +2 | leap-frog action |
David Hollywood
|
Change log
Mar 22, 2014 15:40: Steffen Walter changed "Field" from "Bus/Financial" to "Law/Patents" , "Field (specific)" from "Law: Taxation & Customs" to "Law (general)" , "Field (write-in)" from "corporate tax and capital gains tax" to "(none)"
Proposed translations
+2
2 mins
David Hollywood
Native in English
Works in field
worked for int. orgs (IMF, OAS, IDB)
Native in: English
Works in: Spanish to English, German to English
Related KudoZ points
:
318
Selected
leap-frog action
:)
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 4 mins (2012-12-18 19:36:47 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
eur-lex.europa.eu/Notice.do?...En caché - Traducir esta página
Haz hecho público que te gusta. Deshacer
... Bertelsmann brought, without prior administrative procedure, a .leap-frog. action (.Sprungklage.) before the Finanzgericht Münster (Finance Court, Munster) .
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 4 mins (2012-12-18 19:37:34 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Sprungklage I (StR ) immediate litigation brought to reverse an administrative action
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 6 mins (2012-12-18 19:39:06 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
. As Bertelsmann considered that the inclusion in the taxable amount of the delivery costs of the supply of the bonuses infringed the Sixth Directive, it raised a leap-frog action (Sprungklage) in the Finanzgericht (Finance Court). The Finanzgericht dismissed the action on the ground that in the assessment to be undertaken for the purpose of determining the taxable amount of the transactions akin to exchange in accordance with Paragraph 10(2)(2) of the UStG, account must be taken not only of the purchase price of the bonuses but also of the delivery costs for the supply of the bonuses. It was moreover the case, therefore, that, contrary to the submission of the plaintiff, there was no breach of Article 11A(2)(b) of the Sixth Directive either.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 6 mins (2012-12-18 19:39:23 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/staging/Notice.do?mode=dbl&lang=en&...
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 15 mins (2012-12-18 19:47:54 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
another option might be "to bring a direct action"
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 17 mins (2012-12-18 19:49:49 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
or: lodge a direct application .... (will depend on context)
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 4 mins (2012-12-18 19:36:47 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
eur-lex.europa.eu/Notice.do?...En caché - Traducir esta página
Haz hecho público que te gusta. Deshacer
... Bertelsmann brought, without prior administrative procedure, a .leap-frog. action (.Sprungklage.) before the Finanzgericht Münster (Finance Court, Munster) .
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 4 mins (2012-12-18 19:37:34 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Sprungklage I (StR ) immediate litigation brought to reverse an administrative action
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 6 mins (2012-12-18 19:39:06 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
. As Bertelsmann considered that the inclusion in the taxable amount of the delivery costs of the supply of the bonuses infringed the Sixth Directive, it raised a leap-frog action (Sprungklage) in the Finanzgericht (Finance Court). The Finanzgericht dismissed the action on the ground that in the assessment to be undertaken for the purpose of determining the taxable amount of the transactions akin to exchange in accordance with Paragraph 10(2)(2) of the UStG, account must be taken not only of the purchase price of the bonuses but also of the delivery costs for the supply of the bonuses. It was moreover the case, therefore, that, contrary to the submission of the plaintiff, there was no breach of Article 11A(2)(b) of the Sixth Directive either.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 6 mins (2012-12-18 19:39:23 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/staging/Notice.do?mode=dbl&lang=en&...
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 15 mins (2012-12-18 19:47:54 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
another option might be "to bring a direct action"
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 17 mins (2012-12-18 19:49:49 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
or: lodge a direct application .... (will depend on context)
Peer comment(s):
| agree |
Johanna Timm, PhD
: I like your suggestion "immediate litigation brought to reverse an administrative action"! Also found in Schäfer: http://tiny.cc/em3ipwh
38 mins
|
|
thanks Johanna :) sounds like it would fit the context but would be nice to have said context ...
|
|
| agree |
Katharina Leipp
: Ja das passt
2 days 12 hrs
|
|
danke Katharina :)
|
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
Comment: "Thank you. I also like the suggestion "immediate action brought to reverse an administrative action" because in my text that is exactly what it is! I can use the leap-frog in parenthesis! "
Discussion