This question was closed without grading. Reason: No acceptable answer
Aug 4, 2016 14:51
7 yrs ago
8 viewers *
Swedish term
Trygghetsförsäkring
Swedish to English
Bus/Financial
Insurance
Type or insurance
This applies to a "Trygghetsförsäkring för värmepumpar" so has nothing to do with Industrial Injuries or Accidents. As far as I can see, the insurance covers the "excess" the consumer has to pay when claiming from household insurance in the event of damage to the pump.
Proposed translations
(English)
4 +1 | zero deductible coverage | Deane Goltermann |
4 | (AmE) excess-waiver > (BrE) zero-excess > insurance | Adrian MM. (X) |
4 | insurance against excess and depreciation deductions | Sven Petersson |
3 | comprehensive insurance | Tariq Khader (X) |
Proposed translations
32 mins
comprehensive insurance
Given the context, I would suggest this
Peer comment(s):
agree |
George Hopkins
18 mins
|
Thank you George
|
|
disagree |
Sven Petersson
: http://www.nibe.se/Documents/nibe_se/Trygghetsforsakring.pdf
58 mins
|
What is your suggestion Sven?
|
1 hr
(AmE) excess-waiver > (BrE) zero-excess > insurance
Before US lawyers (refuse to) rally to my support, I have a nagging doubt that there can be comprehensive insurance with a 'compulsory or voluntary excess': see the second example sentence.
Example sentence:
Trygghetsförsäkringen, som är en självriskeliminering, togs till en början fram i nära samarbete.
What are the pros and cons of getting comprehensive car insurance over other ... have to pay for expensive repairs – just your compulsory and voluntary excess.
Reference:
http://www.arctic.se/forsakringslosningar/varmepumpar/
http://www.moneymaxim.co.uk/faq/car-hire-insurance/excess-waiver-insurance
1 hr
insurance against excess and depreciation deductions
WARNING!
The term "trygghetsförsäkran" has a very well defined meaning, which differs drastically from Nibe's. The use of the term "trygghetsförsäkran" by Nibe in http://www.nibe.se/Documents/nibe_se/Trygghetsforsakring.pdf may be considered fraudulent if tried by a Swedish court.
Whenever in doubt; tell the truth!
The term "trygghetsförsäkran" has a very well defined meaning, which differs drastically from Nibe's. The use of the term "trygghetsförsäkran" by Nibe in http://www.nibe.se/Documents/nibe_se/Trygghetsforsakring.pdf may be considered fraudulent if tried by a Swedish court.
Whenever in doubt; tell the truth!
+1
2 hrs
zero deductible coverage
I know this is used for cars around Europe (see the reference). I've seen it for home insurance in the US.
Here you are looking covering the deductible you usually have in home (and other) insurance. Excess insurance is for additional coverage for any damages in excess of the insurance amount of your home (or other policy). See http://finance.zacks.com/difference-between-excess-insurance...
For a primer see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deductible.
Here you are looking covering the deductible you usually have in home (and other) insurance. Excess insurance is for additional coverage for any damages in excess of the insurance amount of your home (or other policy). See http://finance.zacks.com/difference-between-excess-insurance...
For a primer see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deductible.
Reference:
Discussion
Some ideas to play with...