Jul 25, 2020 12:17
3 yrs ago
9 viewers *
Danish term
Spain
Strict adherence to confidentiality
Native in: Spanish 
, German
Works in: German to Spanish, English to Spanish, Danish to Spanish, and 2 more.
der har et omfang set i forhold til de krænkende optagelser
Danish to English
Law/Patents
Law (general)
I don't understand this part of the following sentence:
Efter de rapporter, skærmprints mv., som er fremlagt i sagen, er der ikke grundlag for at antage, at der er et lovligt indhold på XXX og en brug heraf, der har et omfang set i forhold til de krænkende optagelser og eventuelt andet indhold, som krænker andre rettighedshaveres ophavsrettigheder, som betyder, at...
(from a court order pertainig copyrights)
Thanks
Efter de rapporter, skærmprints mv., som er fremlagt i sagen, er der ikke grundlag for at antage, at der er et lovligt indhold på XXX og en brug heraf, der har et omfang set i forhold til de krænkende optagelser og eventuelt andet indhold, som krænker andre rettighedshaveres ophavsrettigheder, som betyder, at...
(from a court order pertainig copyrights)
Thanks
Proposed translations
(English)
| 3 -1 | has a scope, as to the [alleged] infringing recordings |
TechLawDC
|
Proposed translations
-1
1 day 21 hrs
has a scope, as to the [alleged] infringing recordings
Translation of phrase: er der ikke grundlag for at antage, at der er et lovligt indhold på XXX og en brug heraf, der har et omfang set i forhold til de krænkende optagelser og eventuelt andet indhold, som krænker andre rettighedshaveres ophavsrettigheder = there is no basis for assuming that XXX has legally cognizant content and that use of XXX has a scope, as to the [alleged] infringing recordings and any other content, which infringes the copyrights of other copyright holders.
(More guidance regarding the context might be helpful.)
(More guidance regarding the context might be helpful.)
Peer comment(s):
| disagree |
Christopher Schröder
: Both the suggestion and the longer translation misconstrue the Danish // There is no mention of cognisant content (which is?!). There is no “as to”. The repetition of XXX. You may know about law, but not Danish grammar. I explained in the discussion.
3 hrs
|
|
More explanation by you would be helpful. In copyright litigation I have seen similar language before. I am not making it up.
|
Discussion
In other words, there is not enough legitimate content on the site to
conclude other than whatever the sentence says next