This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential to the operation of the site, while others help to improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used. For more information, please see the ProZ.com privacy policy.
Cookie settings
  1. KudoZ™ Top
  2. English to Romanian
  3. Law: Contract(s)

KudoZ question not available

Romanian translation: a obține compensarea judiciară a creanțelor certe față de cineva

GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW)
English term or phrase: to set off undisputed claims against someone
Romanian translation:a obține compensarea judiciară a creanțelor certe față de cineva
Entered by: Daniel Grigoras

10:39 Mar 17, 2012
English to Romanian translations [PRO]
Law/Patents - Law: Contract(s) / contract de finantare din fonduri europene
English term or phrase: to set off undisputed claims against someone
If the Managing Authority exercises its right of termination, the Lead
Partner is only entitled to set off undisputed claims against the Managing
Authority.
Irena Vasiu
Local time: 05:05
a obține compensarea judiciară a revendicărilor necontestate față de cineva
Explanation:
“Abatement, set-off and counterclaim - what's the difference?

The difference between abatement, set-off and counterclaim is all too often misunderstood. Abatement is the process of reducing a price or a value on the grounds, for example, that the works have not been properly carried out, are incomplete, or not carried out at all. By contrast a set-off is a defence to a claim used to reduce or extinguish a claim and is resultant from a party's breach of contract. However a counterclaim, whilst also results from a party's breach of contract, may also give rise to an award for damages.

Damages sought as a counterclaim or advanced as part of a set-off will usually relate to the cost of rectifying the defective works or the costs caused by delay by the application of liquidated damages. Abatement, however, will relate to the resultant reduction in value of the work as a result of the defect.” http://www.silver-shemmings.co.uk/article.asp?aid=1

“When facing a claim before an arbitral tribunal, the defendant has three options at his disposal. One is, naturally, to deny the claimant’s allegations. The other, a more ‘offensive’ tactic, would be to submit a counterclaim, and the third, a ‘defensive’ option, to raise a set-off defense. The same is also applicable in litigation. Comparative systems of civil procedure clearly distinguish between the counterclaim (Widerklage, demande reconventionelle, domanda riconvenzionale) and the set-off defense [Processaufrechnung (Verrechnung in Switzerland), compensation legale, eccezione di compensazione]” (http://www.ius.bg.ac.rs/Anali/Annals 2006/Annals 2006 101-11...


„Compensaţia este de trei feluri: legală, convenţională şi judiciară.

Compensaţia judiciară. Compensaţia judiciară operează în temeiul unei hotărâri judecătoreşti rămasă definitivă. Pentru pronunţarea ei, nu este necesară întrunirea condiţiilor prevăzute la compensaţia legală. Instanţele de judecată procedează în acest fel atunci când, într-un proces, pârâtul formulează,prin cerere reconvenţională, pretenţii proprii împotriva reclamantului. Dacă pretentiile reciproce au fost dovedite, instanţa de judecată procedează, adeseori, compensarea lor şi obligă la executare doar pe debitorul celei mai mari datorii pentru a plăti diferenţa de datorie care a rămas după compensare.” http://www.scribd.com/doc/44044005/Teoria-Generala-a-Obligat...
Selected response from:

Daniel Grigoras
Romania
Grading comment
multumesc! cred ca ar merge si varianta "a obtine compensarea creantelor necontestate impotriva cuiva", fiind vorba in contextul mai larg de platile efectuate sau neefectuate in cadrul proiectului.
4 KudoZ points were awarded for this answer



Summary of answers provided
4a obține compensarea judiciară a revendicărilor necontestate față de cineva
Daniel Grigoras
4a compensa
Diana Casu


Discussion entries: 1





  

Answers


2 hrs   confidence: Answerer confidence 4/5Answerer confidence 4/5
to set off undisputed claims against someone
a obține compensarea judiciară a revendicărilor necontestate față de cineva


Explanation:
“Abatement, set-off and counterclaim - what's the difference?

The difference between abatement, set-off and counterclaim is all too often misunderstood. Abatement is the process of reducing a price or a value on the grounds, for example, that the works have not been properly carried out, are incomplete, or not carried out at all. By contrast a set-off is a defence to a claim used to reduce or extinguish a claim and is resultant from a party's breach of contract. However a counterclaim, whilst also results from a party's breach of contract, may also give rise to an award for damages.

Damages sought as a counterclaim or advanced as part of a set-off will usually relate to the cost of rectifying the defective works or the costs caused by delay by the application of liquidated damages. Abatement, however, will relate to the resultant reduction in value of the work as a result of the defect.” http://www.silver-shemmings.co.uk/article.asp?aid=1

“When facing a claim before an arbitral tribunal, the defendant has three options at his disposal. One is, naturally, to deny the claimant’s allegations. The other, a more ‘offensive’ tactic, would be to submit a counterclaim, and the third, a ‘defensive’ option, to raise a set-off defense. The same is also applicable in litigation. Comparative systems of civil procedure clearly distinguish between the counterclaim (Widerklage, demande reconventionelle, domanda riconvenzionale) and the set-off defense [Processaufrechnung (Verrechnung in Switzerland), compensation legale, eccezione di compensazione]” (http://www.ius.bg.ac.rs/Anali/Annals 2006/Annals 2006 101-11...


„Compensaţia este de trei feluri: legală, convenţională şi judiciară.

Compensaţia judiciară. Compensaţia judiciară operează în temeiul unei hotărâri judecătoreşti rămasă definitivă. Pentru pronunţarea ei, nu este necesară întrunirea condiţiilor prevăzute la compensaţia legală. Instanţele de judecată procedează în acest fel atunci când, într-un proces, pârâtul formulează,prin cerere reconvenţională, pretenţii proprii împotriva reclamantului. Dacă pretentiile reciproce au fost dovedite, instanţa de judecată procedează, adeseori, compensarea lor şi obligă la executare doar pe debitorul celei mai mari datorii pentru a plăti diferenţa de datorie care a rămas după compensare.” http://www.scribd.com/doc/44044005/Teoria-Generala-a-Obligat...

Example sentence(s):
  • Partenerul Principal are dreptul la compensarea judiciară doar a revendicărilor necontestate față de Autoritatea de Management

    Reference: http://www.scj.ro/SE%20rezumate%202004/SE%20r%201694%202004....
Daniel Grigoras
Romania
Works in field
Native speaker of: Romanian
PRO pts in category: 40
Grading comment
multumesc! cred ca ar merge si varianta "a obtine compensarea creantelor necontestate impotriva cuiva", fiind vorba in contextul mai larg de platile efectuate sau neefectuate in cadrul proiectului.
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade)

2 hrs   confidence: Answerer confidence 4/5Answerer confidence 4/5



Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.

You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.

Return to KudoZ list

KudoZ™ translation help

The KudoZ network provides a framework for translators and others to assist each other with translations or explanations of terms and short phrases.

See also:
ProZ.com term search
Search millions of term translations
Close search
Term search
  • All of ProZ.com
  • Term search
  • Jobs
  • Forums
  • Multiple search