GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
16:00 Jul 23, 2008 |
French to English translations [PRO] Tech/Engineering - Mining & Minerals / Gems | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: B D Finch France Local time: 19:09 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
3 | were the project not to proceed |
| ||
3 -1 | for its own sake |
|
Discussion entries: 4 | |
---|---|
were the project not to proceed Explanation: I think that Segolene is thinking along the right lines. However, this is more likely to be that the "sans projet" case is applied to the other variables and might take into account any known or likely changes in the environment that would occur were the project not to proceed. This is in contrast to just assuming that if a particular project didn't happen the status quo would continue. |
| |
Grading comment
| ||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
for its own sake Explanation: Hello, In other words, they will do it for no other reason than for the sake of doing it. sans projets = without any reason/plan behind it consider the variation for its own sake I hope this helps. -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 2 hrs (2008-07-23 18:11:33 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- I really don't understand the context that well. My confidance level should have been a "2" more than a "3". I just thought that "sans projects" meant "without plans"; in other words, there were being considered and analyzed for their own sake (no plans/reason behind it). -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 2 hrs (2008-07-23 18:13:09 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- If they do it "sans projet", it may mean they're doing just for the sake of doing it (exploration, etc). Is this really nonsense? Maybe, it is...but at least you know where I'm coming from. LOL. -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 8 hrs (2008-07-24 00:43:48 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- Perhaps, "to consider them in their own right"????? |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.